Ray PP (2023) ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet Things Cyber-Phys Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
Eysenbach G (2023) The role of ChatGPT, generative language models, and artificial intelligence in medical education: a conversation with ChatGPT and a call for papers. JMIR Med Educ. https://doi.org/10.2196/46885
Alfertshofer M, Hoch CC, Funk PF et al (2023) Sailing the seven seas: A multinational comparison of ChatGPT’s performance on medical licensing examinations. Ann Biomed Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03338-3
Ali R, Tang OY, Connolly ID et al (2023) Performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on neurosurgery written board examinations. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002632
Antaki F, Touma S, Milad D et al (2023) Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in ophthalmology: an analysis of its successes and shortcomings. Ophthalmology Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2023.100324
Azizoğlu M, Okur MH (2023) How does ChatGPT perform on the European Board of Pediatric Surgery examination? A randomized comparative study. Res Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3018641/v1
Beaulieu-Jones BR, Shah S, Berrigan MT et al (2023) Evaluating capabilities of large language models: performance of GPT4 on surgical knowledge Assessments. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.16.23292743
Caglar U, Yildiz O, Meric A et al (2023) Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions related to pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.08.003
Deebel NA, Terlecki R (2023) ChatGPT performance on the American urological association self-assessment study program and the potential influence of artificial intelligence in urologic training. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.010
Friederichs H, Friederichs WJ, März M (2023) ChatGPT in medical school: how successful is AI in progress testing? Med Educ Online. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2220920
Gencer A, Aydin S (2023) Can ChatGPT pass the thoracic surgery exam? A J Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2023.08.001
Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T, et al (2023) How does ChatGPT perform on the United States Medical licensing examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Med Educ. https://doi.org/10.2196/45312
Guerra GA, Hofmann H, Sobhani S et al (2023) GPT-4 artificial intelligence model outperforms ChatGPT, medical students, and neurosurgery residents on neurosurgery written board-like questions. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.042
Hoch CC, Wollenberg B, Lüers J-C et al (2023) ChatGPT’s quiz skills in different otolaryngology subspecialties: an analysis of 2576 single-choice and multiple-choice board certification preparation questions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngolog. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08051-4
Huynh LM, Bonebrake BT, Schultis K et al (2023) New Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT Performs Poorly on the 2022 Self-assessment Study Program for Urology. Urol Pract. https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000406
Jung LB, Gudera JA, Wiegand TLT et al (2023) ChatGPT passes German state examination in medicine with picture questions omitted. Dtsch Arztebl Int. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0113
Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A et al (2023) Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digit Health. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
Lewandowski M, Łukowicz P, Świetlik D, Barańska-Rybak W (2023) An original study of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 Dermatological Knowledge Level based on the Dermatology Specialty Certificate Examinations. Clin Exp Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llad255
May M, Körner-Riffard K, Marszalek M, Eredics K (2023) Would the generative artificial intelligence Uro_Chat, a newly developed large language model, have successfully passed the In-Service Assessment questions of the European Board of Urology in the year 2022? Eur Urol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.013
Moshirfar M, Altaf AW, Stoakes IM, et al (2023) Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a comparative analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and human expertise in answering StatPearls questions. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40822
Oh N, Choi G-S, Lee WY (2023) ChatGPT goes to the operating room: evaluating GPT-4 performance and its potential in surgical education and training in the era of large language models. Ann Surg Treat Res. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.104.5.269
Saad A, Iyengar KP, Kurisunkal V, Botchu R (2023) Assessing ChatGPT’s ability to pass the FRCS orthopaedic part A exam: a critical analysis. Surgeon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2023.07.001
Singhal K, Tu T, Gottweis J et al (2023) Towards expert-level medical question answering with large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2305.09617
Skalidis I, Cagnina A, Luangphiphat W et al (2023) ChatGPT takes on the European exam in core cardiology: an artificial intelligence success story? Eur Heart J Digit Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad029
Suchman K, Garg S, Trindade AJ (2023) Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer Fails the Multiple-Choice American College of Gastroenterology Self-Assessment. Am J Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002320
Takagi S, Watari T, Erabi A, Sakaguchi K (2023) Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Japanese medical licensing examination: comparison study. JMIR Med Educ. https://doi.org/10.2196/48002
Thirunavukarasu AJ, Hassan R, Mahmood S et al (2023) Trialling a large language model (ChatGPT) in general practice with the applied knowledge test: observational study demonstrating opportunities and limitations in primary care. JMIR Med Educ. https://doi.org/10.2196/46599
Weng T-L, Wang Y-M, Chang S et al (2023) ChatGPT failed Taiwan’s Family medicine board exam. J Chin Med Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1097/jcma.0000000000000946
Khene Z-E, Bigot P, Mathieu R et al (2023) Development of a personalized chat model based on the european association of urology oncology guidelines: harnessing the power of generative artificial intelligence in clinical practice. Eur Urol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.009
May M, Körner-Riffard K, Kollitsch L (2024) Can ChatGPT realistically and reproducibly assess the difficulty level of written questions in the In-Service Assessment of the European Board of Urology? Urology 183:302–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.036
